Oppo Challenge

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 06/28/2015 at 20:02 • Filed to: None

2

19

Find me the coolest used luxury car you can in the Chicago area, something you are really curious about. If it has more than 2 doors and is under $65,000 (preferably a lot under), and is not For Sale By Owner, maybe we’ll swing by and take it for a spin. I am doing this to break up what is going to be and endless string of crossover test drives tomorrow. Kthxbai.

jkm7680 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/28/2015 at 20:06

0

Port of Quattro. Lol, it says Quattro in it. Lol, but it’s a Maserati.

not for canada - australian in disguise > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/28/2015 at 20:06

1

Done and done.

http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/…

I mean, it’s a SCV6, but still.

JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/28/2015 at 20:10

1

http://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/…

It’s electric!

FromCanadaWithLove > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/28/2015 at 20:13

3

http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/…

JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/28/2015 at 20:13

2

Yes, its kinda a crossover. But so so so far from boring!

http://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/…

Birddog > JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! 06/28/2015 at 20:35

0

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! 06/28/2015 at 20:54

0

You can feel it.

Dukie - Jalopnik Emergency Management Asshole > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/29/2015 at 09:42

1

1996 Rolls Royce Silver Spur II

http://chicago.craigslist.org/wcl/ctd/509081…

EL_ULY > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/29/2015 at 09:49

2

BEAST!

Milky > EL_ULY 06/29/2015 at 09:56

0

The class is strong with this one.

If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/29/2015 at 09:56

0

I reject your criteria and substitute my own.

Vicente Esteve > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/29/2015 at 10:10

1

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Bentley-Co…

It was a pleasure to help.

KatzManDu > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/29/2015 at 10:30

0

http://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/…

http://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/…

http://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/…

http://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/…

http://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/…

Galileo Humpkins (aka MC Clap Yo Handz) > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/29/2015 at 10:40

3

S6? S6!

http://www.audiwestmont.com/used/Audi/2013…

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent 06/29/2015 at 10:58

1

That’s okay, I reject your suggestion and substitute my own.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > KatzManDu 06/29/2015 at 11:04

0

Unfortunately, the only two cars you nominated that fit the criteria are cars we’ve already driven.

If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/29/2015 at 11:31

1

I reject your rejection and reject my own.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > JQJ213- Now With An Extra Cylinder! 06/29/2015 at 18:00

1

Congratulations. If this were a contest, you would be the winner. We slightly changed the vehicle to an X5M (because the X6 in all of its derivatives is kind of dumb), but close enough.

KatzManDu > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 06/30/2015 at 03:13

1

I know, but I was kind of being silly. D’oh! :)